/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12104791
>doesn't know what samefag means
point to the post where i'm pretending to be someone else, newfag

>>11599636
Or maybe you're a retard. Yeah, that's the one.

>>11542385
>I can see why some people being pedantic can be annoying but it is also often a major source of confusion for newcomers to a subject.
looks like you've already been BTFO'd on multiple points before on this very topic AND you already conceded that your totally subjective stance on Einstein's notation abuse is useful. so why the fuck are you still going around correcting people? You're being a pedant, and your correction is so stupidly niche and insignificant that your appeal to "i'm just trying to help out the noobs" is so clearly in a bad faith that it's laughable. https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1024280/most-ambiguous-and-inconsistent-phrases-and-notations-in-maths/1025161#1025161

>>11497844
>If you don't know econ, don't talk about it anon.
Sounds like you don't know econ if you think anything I said was even remotely controversial. Not only are you breaking your own rule, but by that logic none of these threads should exist period. Kill yourself, dumbfuck.

>>11492301
>I'm discouraging your narcissistic attempt to absolve yourself of guilt surrounding your interactions with him when you just found out he died.
What are you even talking about? I've never had any interaction with him here, that I know of (it's an anonymous imageboard), nor did I imply that I did. I've never really had any direct negative (negative on my end, obviously) interaction with him.

>I'm not going to encourage your self pity.
What's your point here? I don't have any, and I never asked you to.

>If you told someone with schizophrenia to kill themselves, and they did it, you should feel bad.
When did I say I did? The point is that everybody is told to kill themselves here, schizophrenic or not, and it's completely brain-dead to have expected otherwise.

>You encouraged this situation by trolling him and you're now trying to use the way you perceived his personality as justification for it. It's pathetic.
I never trolled him once, in fact I watched all of his videos and even thought one of them wasn't total shit. You can see my comment on his anime amv. Taking the moral highground like this only after he died is extremely pathetic, so it's bizarre you're using that word for me. His personality was self-absorbed, and he admitted it. Even more extreme, in his view, nobody else even existed. There is absolutely no debate there. While the other two adjectives are subjective, I would claim they're basically pleonasm naturally extending from his worldview.

You aren't a very bright human being, and there is no repair for you I'm afraid.

>>11480124
>Can you guess why we don't?
I can see the gears turning in your head as you put the argument you think you're making here and the argument you're actually making together

>>11478094
>The virus doesn't trigger it it only triggers people with auto immune disorders.
False. I know you are basically brain-dead but it would do you well to top spreading information. Just take my word for it, since any reasoning will go right through both of your ears. Coronaviruses trigger asthma attacks. This is a well, long documented fact.
>People of all ages can be infected by the new coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Older people, and people with pre-existing medical conditions (such as asthma, diabetes, heart disease) appear to be more vulnerable to becoming severely ill with the virus.

>You mean peak when the summer hits?
Yes because you can't get coronaviruses in the summer!! Jesus you are unbelievably dumb, it's seriously difficult to believe how dumb people can be. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
>durr no U are retarded
good one dumbfuck

>>11478099
Not an argument. Also a sign that you spend way too much time on these boards

>>11374816
>literally awful book
>dont listen to him he's retarded
brainlet detected. it's the bible for electronics, if you go ask this question to people that *actually* know and practice electronics (like /diy/'s /ohm/) instead of retarded pseud's like yourself, you'll find the answer is totally consistent:
>art of electronics

it's not my nor OP's problem that you can't understand these things

>>11368975
>If you are not responsible for the costs of products you buy, why do you pay for their manufacture?
Because in order to function and be competitive in contemporary society, I need to own a phone? And if I decide to take a moral stance against silicon wafer technology because they don't deal with the waste properly, that I'm just fucking myself? Because if I, as an individual, make any decision it's not going to change literally anything?

>>11367068
>/pol/ poster here, got 122 but had to rush through the last 15 or so % of the test
>not posting screenshots because dont want to be datamined by glow-in-the darks

>>10367064