/sci/ - Science & Math

Damn, energy get always somehow being consumed, but for that thing, can't you just cool the air? You'd need minimum 30% effective gas turbine to do this.

I've made this once I've red how effecient that thing is on heating up stuff.

>>16349639
I've started there. Few years later I have come with this energy harvester. I even have some betterment of it, which is not yet in diagram.

Please, explain this by statistical approach to brown motion.

>>16345963
Does thermoeconomics include heatpumps and heatengine?

Because this is my thermal generator, cools the air, obtain mechanical energy.

Thermoeconomics probably have nothing it can pump energy from, and isn't thermo at all.

You are just overfitting.

>>16336362
We can create power from the fact that air is somewhere around 300K, number like that look better than 27C,...

Literally we won't run out of heat here.

Law free zone certified. It's not closed system so law doesn't apply.

I forgot to update graphics for the version, where we preheat gas from expander by environment and then inject heat from condenser into it and then compress it again.

Can somebody formulate equations about gases here?

I think coolant #1 should be ammonia,
Coolant #2 diethyl ether, as it is liquid with 30°C swtiching point.

The whole system wouldn't exceed temperature of water boiling, yet tourbine would be spinning to counter gradient, it'll get environment colder and run on it's energy.

Remember: Laws's doesn't apply because it's not a closed system.

>>16334824
Turbine is more efficient.