/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12635774
So true. This is the whole problem with trusting science completely. It is a good tool, but allowing yourself to totally tie your understanding of the world to science shuts off a lot of plausible alternate paths of knowledge/understanding. Who knows, it may be true that our consciousness can be computed by a computer, but it could also be possible that the evolution of our brains has exploited quirks in physical/spacetime properties that enhances our consciousness in ways that can't be predicted even after thousands of years of unabated scientific progress.

>>12502790
>When you go at 99% of the speed of light, light still travels away from you at the speed of light.
At 1% faster andor 100% andor 99% andor 101% faster andor other?

After that may be energy andor light oceans, forests, fields - information densities (?) (and some (whereandwhenandhow and an other word other than the integral question phrase words) constructs) and the edge of extradimensionality andor (a) god consciousness - if good - in some way andor form - as more coherent and advanced and freeform than their somewhat heavily constrained yet quasiparadoxically hyperfree existent emanations here and thus somewhat less coherent also and a third category.

In regards to the "99%" quotated and highlighted reply intro; if there are light constructs whether extradimensional andor not, and there are some very interinteresting interratios and interphenoma between physics fields facets, would you imagine that infornons are viewed similarly as to how standard physicality beings veiw light? And beyond the infornons is actually the aforementioned extradimensional andor a different kind of that? Such as astral andor spirit andor metaphysical realms?
Whilst many facets are entangled and have gateways, the ones that do not i.e. cannot physically host a 90D object etc in 11D reality - there are some connections whereby it is vaguely possible - even though there often exist pros and cons either way, noting that there are also pros and cons of proists and anticonists (and personally rediculously antiproists and conists) occassionally which could and should be intelligently considered how?

Might be an informal andor formal interform interplay including nonstructs and unstructs like a god shaped hole in time - however this idea could be expounded better which would elucidate better ideas that could spring from a transreaction from a transaction, however in the context of this phrase it may be a transaction cultivated from a transreaction. So the lingua morphs weirdly.