/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12162086
>Bro, this thread is about 5G. That's clearly the frequency range we are talking about.
5G is currently planned to use multiple bands from 600MHz (decimeter band) all the way to 72 GHz (Millimeter band). You didn't check the pastebin, did you? See the 5G section. I don't remember exactly how spectrum is being allocated for FR1 and FR2, but links to all of it are in there.

>Looking at the effects on ion flux, all the data seems to be about high intensity RF fields


Like I said, I don't know what you've read. You'll have to be more specific about what you mean, because this seems to be coming from an alternate reality, relative to me. The linked data shows no such thing. Heating and induced currents would simply kill, or overtly damage via eg electroporation, cells before it would specifically alter ion flux, cause DNA damage, or any of the other effects which have been observed. Ion channels are constructed specifically to resist random thermal noise.

>I can't find anything about RF fields affecting electron transport
Martin Blank et al, DNA as a fractal antenna.

>I'm not going to look into every idea you have presented.
Okay?

>Don't give me the Gish gallop.
Gish gallop only applies in relatime conversation, this is 4channel. This is beginning to seemk like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
to me.

>It's impossible to discuss an entire nebulous network of ideas in totality.
That's understandable, but you need to realize this is an entire field that you're new to. All the mechanisms I've listed are relevant, and multiple mechanisms can be operating at once when considering any given effect in humans or an animal model. If you want to treat it like a debate or a debunking, pick one and come at it. If you want to learn and discuss, familarize yourself with the data, go through the files in the OP, and so forth. Not sure what you're asking for.