/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4805885
wut?

a/b = x/y
DOES NOT IMPLY x=a, and b=y

Did you not learn fractions? WTF?

>nothing in the universe is faster than light.

ITT: underage faggots use have never actually studied SR or GR, they assume nothing can go faster then light, from bad Pop-science

SR + GR, says that info/matter cannot go faster then light. However some shit can go faster then light.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light

If a laser is swept across a distant object, the spot of light can easily be made to move at a speed greater than c. Similarly, a shadow projected onto a distant object can be made to move faster than c. In neither case does any information travel faster than light.

Also, moving space near rotating blackholes, can move FTL.

(see the wiki for the sources)

\thread

>>2036418
I think the OP is gone

This is now a nerd girl thread!

Help?

>>2002018
>consumer use

A couple of peers of mine are working on them, asked them about it before. Ranges vary from 2030-2060.

>>1727768
Ic, so you are then unaware that the stardard way decay rates are given are from 0 mometum already.

Anytime you see a decay rate, it is usually assumed that the partcile is decaying with zero momentum (unless specified otherwise).