/sci/ - Science & Math

dump inbound

>>6852530
I believe if we could see light in it's entirety and at a speed we could perceive it as (atleast) a 3d object, we'd find it to be fluid/gaseous. The surface of a fluid making contact with a more solid object will make an impact with it's rippled, dimpled, peaks and valley covered surface.

I think to understand light better like in this double slit experiment we could learn a lot if we could move this experiment to low-g or no gravity situations with a fluid.

>>6604626
>This is a good point

If you take any substance that has any form and is transparent, you'll find a dark border. Remember that these images
>>6604624
>>6604625
>>6604627
are of a 3D object. Those cells are not bisected accept by illusion alone. The edge must always be darker because light has to pass through a thicker plane of molecules in a curve that extends outward from our eyes. The every 3D object has a border and that border must at some point curve both away and towards the viewer on all sides.

I see it both ways, my friends. It is quiet possibly true.

>>5956281
+1

ok here's the deal
i had to write a paper, but i'm shit at working with APA reference style, annybody got something to help me with that?

i need a likert scale to measure popularity in a survey

i thought about the Rosenberg scale but that's about self evaluation not popularity