/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2410247

No. That would be too limited. I rather think of neural networks too, if there is some general AI at all. But maybe specialized and purpose bound algorithms will work better anyway.

Dear /sci/entists,

It may has come to your attention that more and more non disguised troll threads come up in /sci/, and I am not talking about the classic religion vs. science trolls. So there must be a lot of /b/tards around here, what I can fully understand, because there board is one big piece of crap. The question is: Why did this recently increase that much?

A part of it can be blamed on me. From time to time I try to provoke /b/tards monitoring /sci/ to start shitstorms in my threads just for fun. It's easy, you just have to molest one of their memes. But when I do this, they are supposed to stay in the thread and not spend more time on the board.

The question is how to get rid of them again. I don't think that we can just get them of /sci/, but it might help to have another board as their playground. Something between /b/ and /r9k/, positive unlike /b/, but not restrictive like /9k/. What do you think, would it be worth a try to ask moot for this?

Sincerely,
a worried /sci/entist

>>1959379
It's your stupid bawksy you feckin' /b/-tard. What else?

Why didn't you say something before!?