/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10761631
Even if you cherrypick the start and end time and only use RSS data you still get warming. Nice fake graph.

>>10598598
Let's watch!

>if climate scientists were actually worried about global warming, they would be happy about a pause
This sets up the strawman that what Phil Jones was referring to being "worried" about is global warming when it's clear that he would be worried about a result that contradicts basic climatology. You can tell we're off to a great start when Tony is already putting words into people's mouths for his own agenda!

>graph of RSS temperatures starting at 1996 and ending 2014 showing no trend
Tony makes this way too easy. You claim climatologists are fudging the data? Here is Tony fudging the data. Did Tony do a linear regression to find the trend? No, of course not. Tony put a graph in the video WITH A HORIZONTAL LINE DRAWN OVER IT and he calls that no trend. What does the data actually show? Pic related, an upward trend.

Even other deniers know Tony is fucking retarded and can't be trusted with the simplest tasks. Even if we ignore that he cherrypicked the flawed RSS dataset that is known to have an uncorrected orbital bias in it, and even if we ignore that he cherrypicked the start of the data so that the large 1997 El Nino reduces the trendline, we are still left with either Tony's utter fucking incompetence or willful manipulation of the data. Need I go on to destroy the rest of this garbage video? You tell me whether you want to be further BTFO by association to this nutjob.