/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15712477
I made a proof, but it probably has some problems that need to get fixed. I used a non-standard axiomatic framework with some undesirable artifacts in it when I made the proof, and I ought to redo it in my framework for fractional distance analysis. I think the result will hold up, and I have some ideas about how to redo it, but currently I should (might?) rescind my claim for having already proven it. However, I have some better negations of RH that don't refer to my sine/cosine result, and I have definitely proven that RH is false. The main problem in the PDF I'm posting that I have taken away additive absorption from INF, but not multiplicative absorption, and that has consequences which are undesirable enough to conflict with my claim that this is a result in standard analysis.