/sci/ - Science & Math

Just associate as much abstract information as possible with images, stories, sounds... Anything
More connections is better memory.

And when I can't remember something I don't insist on the memory precisely.
I think about where I learned it. I think about who was there. I try to remember the voice who said it. I think of associated ideas, like other formulas, or exercises I did. And then I remember what I was looking for. Because the brain is all connections. And the more you excite associated memories, the more you can find what you seek.

Of course I have no facts to back that up.

Enjoy your tooth decay.

ln(1) - ln(-2)

>>3695989
Yeah sheeps and cows and chickens totally eat each other all the time.

>>3690180
It's called confirmation bias.
It's not worth trying to convince them.
People here don't care about morals in the first place and they've been culturally brainwashed all their life, "hurr durr so alpha".
It's like arguing for atheism in a church.
Anyway I don't give a fuck if people are retarded, they can do whatever they want. Feels good man.

>>3652414
People interested in psychology don't care about science
They write essays, read books and shit. So they're on lit

It's more grouped with social&humanities than with science

We don't need to produce anything.
We take our floating fortress.
Then we go to Africa.
And we threaten shitty nations to give us them stuff.

>>3587088
There isn't any since they are adjacent
Also you can't add or substract if there is an infinity of digit

So why does light stop at 299 792 458m/s in the void?
Because void doesn't exist.
What we call void is in fact hidden dark matter.
This is why light is limited at this speed

Physics don't know that yet, they'll discover it in 500 years
but i share my genius with you

For the paradox of Zeno, an arrow will reach its target because there is a minimum amount of distance which a particle can travel (they will discover it in 500 years but I share with you some of my genius), so when you divide the next distance by 2 it's below the minimum and it doesn't work with reality so the arrow reaches its target. But mathematics are abstract and I can keep dividing by 2 and it will never reach its target, and 0.999.. never reaches 1. Sorry guise. It's not my fault if whoever makes the rules went full retard.

You know why 0.999.. = 1 is wrong ?
Because infinity doesn't exist.

It's okay guise I'm working on it. Bruteforce.
Don't know how long it will take.

5 = 2 * 2 + 1
17 = 4 * 4 + 1
37 = 6 * 6 + 1
101 = 10 * 10 + 1
197 = 14 * 14 + 1
257 = 16 * 16 + 1
401 = 20 * 20 + 1
577 = 24 * 24 + 1
677 = 26 * 26 + 1
1297 = 36 * 36 + 1
1601 = 40 * 40 + 1
2917 = 54 * 54 + 1
3137 = 56 * 56 + 1
4357 = 66 * 66 + 1
5477 = 74 * 74 + 1
7057 = 84 * 84 + 1
8101 = 90 * 90 + 1
8837 = 94 * 94 + 1
12101 = 110 * 110 + 1
13457 = 116 * 116 + 1
14401 = 120 * 120 + 1
15377 = 124 * 124 + 1
15877 = 126 * 126 + 1
16901 = 130 * 130 + 1
17957 = 134 * 134 + 1

>mfw I got 7% at my final calculus exam but still got the year because I rocked algebra and CS
Fuck calculus.