/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15905800
i'm not going to even bother reading a self indulgent long winded rant that only score 115 IQ. try to learn to communicate succinctly

>>15747260
the desire to spend your life as a spectator is common amongst pointless losers
>i just wanna spend the rest of my life watching tv
you'll never make anything of yourself

>>12465841
>pretend

It's not like you faggots know how a magnet works either.

>>12465859
>The only thing we know is there is some force holding galaxies together that can't be explained using the gravity of the known matter inside them. It might be matter we can't observe (hence dark), or something else entirely. I would have named it "unexplained gravity" personally.

Gravity is a description. Hos is a description a force? This is what I mean. "Scientists" pretend to know the answers yet all you have are fancy re-descriptions or the answer is simply another description. I don't give a fuck how many words you can make up for a "field", tell me how the fuck they work already.

>>12465929
>math
Oh look. Another description pretending to explain something.

>>12465957
You said absolutely nothing of use.

>>12466077
>Thank you for so concisely describing
Exactly, now go collect another grant.

>>12466082
A bread and circus show with no bread. No sustenance to keep me full and willing to deal with more "entertainment".

>>12469085
>The scientist that named it dark did so because it doesn't interact with light.
>Ah yes let me define something by what it isn't and what it doesn't do
I would love to see an experiment performed on that. Oh wait, that doesn't really tell me what it is but it keeps me chasing a fucking shadow at least.
>>12469113
It's defined by privation. No one could tell you what it is because it doesn't actually fucking exist.

>>12385423
to be fair if you can't spell or use basic words correctly or make elementary grammar errors, it kind of outs you as a brainlet and there's no need to actually debate or refute any of your points.

the amount of idiotic shit i've read that is rife with spelling and grammar errors is beyond measure. anyone who makes these types of mistakes is not worth debating or even talking to.

>>11036193
>Physical quantities can be measured
Not if they aren't made of something. It's like saying "I measured nothing". It makes absolutely no logical sense whatsoever. So if a field isn't made of something then how the fuck did you measure it?

>>10899443
be gone from this board

>>10829187
>a privation exists

>>10772164
>I don't understand what you mean by property.
"Hot", "cold" ,"Wet", "dry", "large", "small", a feature. Those are properties and they are exhibited by things that exist in reality. The qualitative. What qualities does "space" have? What "features" does it exhibit? It's an attribute of something else that has properties. A privation, not a thing. It's like saying a "shadow" is real and has properties. Shadows aren't real and they're the absence of something that has properties (illumination).

Example:
>air gets heated, air expands
The "air" is "heated" which results in expansion of the exact same fucking thing being heated. "The air" and "heat" are not a force. The air is matter and the properties it has are "heat". Introduce other qualities such as "cold" and you alter the air. It will contract. You have altered something that exists with the properties that it exhibits and what it doesn't exhibit (propertiesobtained from something else perhaps).

Now equate this to "Space" and "time". You can't do it because "time" is not a property of anything and "space" has no properties. The "space" is fucking filled. It's EM and hydrogen molecules, motion, the things that have the actual properties that are anything but "space". What is "space" even describing in your context? The distance between arbitrary point and other arbitrary point? That doesn't mean anything other than what you want it to mean.

>Special relativity describes how spacetime works and its predictions can and have been tested.
Descriptions are not explanations.

>You seem to be completely ignoring everything said about it and then saying there is nothing describing it and it doesn't exist.
Because it doesn't! You're using math as proof when you don't even know what you're trying to prove. You're reifying something that has no existence and you don't even understand why because "the math tells you otherwise". Well once again, math is just a quantified description of what actually occurs.

>>10699022
well you are responsible for your own safety, not me. Snowflake. Here's a tip for you; if you want to feel safe, calm and happy then go to your local doctor and ask for a lobotomy.

>When your betters say that you're causing a problem you would do well to listen
>Appeal to authority the post

Loling at your psychosis

>>10699024
>sounds like you got a terrible government
FTFY. Between 3 different providers this is the best one. Every 6 months I have to balance my fucking power provider like it's a fucking stock portfolio.

>>10288719
>You're the one denying science
I'm denying something that has no properties.

>We measure it on the things it affects.
>Shadows are cold and objects cast the,, since you can feel the effect of them and measure them they exist. What causes them? What do you mean "cause"? They're their own thing because we see them, they must explain themselves!

>Gravitational waves were predicted decades before it was observed, we could explain them before we even observed them.
A wave is not a thing, it's what something does. What causes gravity? Can't fucking explain it can you? It's okay not to know, it's another to pretend that you do.

>This is so dumb, you live in a world where science has again and again proven incredibly usefull and accurate, but you deny it when it feels wrong to you.
The only thing science has ever done throughout history is disprove itself.

Anyway, this is your last (you) unless you want to disprove my claim of "time/space has no properties" without using circular logic/appeal to authority. What causes "space". What "bends" space? What causes "time"? If any of your replies falls under the category of "conceptual" then prove so. Prove how it has a basis in reality. Give me a real world example of time and space at work.

>>10103031
>just calling it that doesn't make it true, lad.

You're right. Please locate the planets "fat" or any other human organ equivalents that it possesses since comparing the earth and a human body can indicate climate change.
If the above made absolutely no sense whatsoever then congratulations. This is your argument.

>during past cycles driven by Milankovitch forcing this is true. for current warming, it isn't.
Because why? Because CO2? No, CO2 Lags behind temperature. Argument, please.

>you don't know what the UHI effect is or how it works.
I just told you exactly how it fucking works you retard. You know, electricity? The phenomena that causes things to move and heat up? I wonder what would happen if you made millions of buildings, filled them with power hungery air conditioners (cold air doesn't come out of the outside unit now does it?) and things that use this magical electricity. Also lets fill every store with neon signs and human beings and get rid all the things that cause shade.

"BTU"- British thermal unit. The human body produced 300 "BTU's" of heat.

"no wind"-no circulation, no dissipation, insulation. No way to move the hot air being capacitized by the fucking giant slabs of rock and asphalt.

How dumbed down do I have to make this for you?

>>10086928
It wasn't when he had a daughter with his ex who mysteriously disappeared off the face of the earth? What about the time he fucked his cousin and never contributed anything to the world save a refrigerator improvement?

>>10083464
>It's tilted because it was always tilted.
Oh well I guess the phenomena just explains itself, that's totally how science works.

Larmor precession, go google it you dunderhead.

>>10012470

Imagine being so selfish that at the end of the entire story you still recommend people go through with it despite having suicide as an option and shit leaking out your new vagina. Then instead of blaming his (oh excuse me, "xirs") own mentally ill ass(vagina) for this mistake, he blames God.

>>10003618
>Going 100mph down a straight highway gets you to your destination quicker than going 100mph on the detour.
>Light is instaneous relative to any detection method

Wouldn't the "detour" just be resistance?

>>9648360
But it's still gas exchange
>2018
>Seriously being an obligate anaerobe

>tfw preparing to an exam based on CISSP

>which is Not Not NOT part of ABCD
>EFGH
>WDC
>VOEA
>XYZ

kill me