[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.8978801 [View]
File: 13 KB, 220x354, TaoGod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8978801

>ching chong eat rice

Why is this guy considered a genius again?

>> No.8100130 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 13 KB, 220x354, TaoGod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8100130

the more drugs you shove into oscar, the more money you can squeeze out of his gentile family. round up for sure. if it makes the dog worse they take him back to you and you get to charge them again. Anyone who thinks you should round down are the reason that Jews are outperforming the goyim

>> No.7902445 [View]
File: 13 KB, 220x354, TaoGod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7902445

>>7902423
>mfw the vast majority of people find integrating difficult

seriously though, math is easy as fuck until graduate level. Unless youre a brainlet that is

>> No.7714536 [View]
File: 13 KB, 220x354, TaoGod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7714536

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terence_Tao

Is there really any point in even trying to succeed as an academic in STEM if you aren't a genius? And I dont mean genius in the le iq sense, but in the Newton/Euler/Tao sense.

Seriously, it feels like no matter how hard I work or how passionate I am, I will never be able to be even close to as successful as people like that.

Anyway, my question is can one make any meaningful contributions to STEM fields without being a genius?

>> No.6706429 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 13 KB, 220x354, 220px-Ttao2006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6706429

Why isn't UCLA ranked higher when they have based Tao?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]