/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15935302
>As already pointed out these things have been tested for decades.
So because wheels, breaks, and other parts of a car have been tested for decades, a car assembles with them will have no issues?
>Just as society and others would be forced to carry the burden of people not doing so?
What? What burdon. It doesn't prevent you from spreading it, yet people who were at virtually zero risk were coerced to take it.
> I know in the U.S. many employers have to pay for healthcare plans and that would be a huge cost in aggregate.
Again unless you're 50+ you have virtually no chance of serious illness from covid.
If you're that concerned about employers having to pay for expensive health care plans why don't you advocate forcing obese people to exercise or smokers to vape?
>On the contrary, risk of severe complications and long-term complications from covid-19 are still lower if you keep up with vaccinations.
We don't know the long term risks of this "vaccine" because they haven't been studied long enough.
Even so the cost benefit of getting this jab while not having comorbidities or being an old unhealthy fuck is ZERO.
>>15935279
>I'm such a genius level critical thinker because I listen to what pharmaceutical companies pay/force doctors to say!
They've never hurt people for profits before!