/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10420055
>our teeth haven't evolved to accommodate yet.
>but they will.

>there's evolutionary pressure on teeth

Future non-brainlet here, I've just finished Gelfand's Algebra in 3 weeks and I'm feeling pretty good about it. Besides the meme picture we all already know, what should my next book be?

>>10169299
It is, since for the p-norm to be defined, [math]|f|^{p}[/math] has to be integrable.

>>10118217
any thoughts?

can any physical object (literally anything) be expressed algebraically?

>>9951827
wrong image

>>9925572
my first thought was this

>"Duh Bro-glee"

If I add 3 to each element of the set of all multiples of 3, do I get the same set?

>>9774759
or P = 0

>>9729575
pic related

>>9730532
Fucked up the latex
[eqn] 9.\bar{9} \equiv \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^n} = 10 [/eqn]
Frogposter btfo

>>9720351
>sum from n to N

Help a retard out please. The way I understand the universe there are the 3 dimensions that we can see and then a fourth related to time and gravity which is like a pinching and pulling or pushing direction away our 3D perspective that we can't see for some reason. Movement in the 4th dimension is what causes what we call gravity and why gravitational lensing exists.
This also leads me to believe that light isn't affected by time because it can seemingly traverse the 4th dimension, except for black holes, instantly explaining its wavelike property and why we can only see the particle properties since we can only see in 3D.

Is there any basis to my ideas or else what resources should I use to understand this concept better without getting a degree in physics?

>>9665350
oh fuck never mind I got it. Forgot that the second entry in the homogeneous coordinate is the projective line

>>9648053
any takers?

>>9647395
>cuck

>>9646196
>My main idea was to "split" a periodic function into a pair of (multi-)functions: a "base" (naively, the starting function on a fundamental interval of choice) and a "transport" function, whereby the periodic function was the composition of these two.
>And then I started to fiddle with each independently and tried to recover as much information about the starting "generalised"-periodic function from this pair. (Which ended with me re-discovering... fractals.)

>>9641232

How do I deal with being a brainlet?

>entropy per unit mass

>the absolute state of Bayesians

Can a Boltzmann brainlet's speed of thought reach [math] 1.1c[/math]?

Are there retarded people in prestigious universities such as MIT? I went into first year eng expecting everyone to be at least slightly above average intelligence but some people are actually straight up retarded. It baffles me that some of these people managed to get 90+ in high school. Yes, I'm aware how easy high school is but this is my verdict after taking that into consideration. This begs the question, are there people with sub 120 iq roaming the campuses of higher tier universities as well?