/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8262522

>But you literally CAN NOT ask these people any real questions. I've argued with them on REAL life things and they don't believe me until they look it up. It's ridiculously insane.

That's a good thing anon, you should be TELLING them to look it up for themselves. That's how intelligence works, questioning every point of view. You don't just accept dogma.You sound pretty dumb for waisting your time arguing with stupid people. I bet you're smug about it too.

>>8242796

>all existences that don't exist
What?

>all the colours you can not imagine to exist in an universe that don't exist.
>all the colours you can not imagine to exist in A universe that DOESN'T exist.

>2E| is where you hair is red
>2E| is where YOUR hair is red

>things that have happened.. so no.
So no what?

>made out of fundamental particles.
Isn't necessarily wrong but it would read better as
>made UP of fundamental particles.

>and then D| it.
>it wants the D| ; p

>desibels
>decibels

>you don't move your fits to he's face?
>his
But I don't get what you're saying here? Maybe fists?

>here you feel satisfied with life all times
>here you feel satisfied with life AT all times

>this is just rough calculations of words you might become to understand
>this is just rough calculations of words you might come to understand

>An existence as our reality, except both of your right eyes have been replaced by a marble.
An existence of our reality...
Is this what you meant?
>except both of your right eyes have been replaced by a marble.
>both of your right eyes
Both of them? How many eyes do you have anon?

>every possible and non possible for of R|' and S'| and beyond.
>every possibility and non possibility for R|' and S'| and beyond.
Or
>every possible and non possible outcome for R|' and S'| and beyond.

>R|' Is the the reality as we know it,
>R|' is the reality as we know it,

>or could had been,
>or could have been,

>using different type of a behaviour
>using different types of behaviour

That was only to 2.3 and I saw mistakes in that also but realised I'm not going to finish proof-reading in one post so I'm just giving up here.

As for your theory, I don't understand how you can implement it and get usable results?

Nor do I understand the premise of your theory.

As it is, you sound too excited about this theory without any substance.

>>6272330
>ooh, look at me! mr 'im too good for lectures'

cunt

>>6252014
>I have a IQ of 140
and are we just supposed to take your word for that, faget?

you are too old to just srart. give up now. if you did in fact graduate, you'll end up running a control room in a shampoo factory (granted you go the CE route).

have fun working in a plant that makes shampoo. thats a ce degree in a nutshell.

>>5554658
>>5554686
>pic unrelated

yeah, OP probably shouldnt have posted that.

>>5506406
that's fucking retarded

>>5432047
>if the moon and the sun are both stars why is the moon not yellow like the sun?

>pretend to be retarded
>hurr durr, quality thread!

twat

>>5290323

>illusion

>zero years old
>having reproductive value

>>4977810
yeh, and look how that turned out
the fuckers got they're own board

>>4956928
[sarcasm] yes, because everyone fucking loves eating cabbage... [/sarcasm]

>>4678915
>but as a religious man i am taught that god will provide.
>on /sci/
best be trollin'

>>3943769
because blackman is a tard.
you, me, and harriet, are all some fat scottish bald man, who posts as 3 different tripfags for some reason

hello /sci/

I need a quick help from you guys.

I need to calculate Power (Watt) for an AC device, knowing Voltage and Amperage.

I've been googling for almost an hour. and I couldn't find the damn formula.
is it even possible to calculate with only Voltage and amperage?..