[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15965094 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1670412728681305.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15965094

>>15965021
>what's to stop us from saying, hey, the portal is obviously stationary, so is the environment around it, so the cube is moving
Because it has no acceleration in respect to the frame of reference it is in, you are moving the portal around the cube, you are not moving the cube into the portal, if you just move the portal up and down without enveloping the cube the cube will just sit stationary on the platform, moving the portal doesn't magically cause the cube to accelerate you troglodyte, just as moving the environment around the cube will not cause it to gain any acceleration, it will have relative motion in respect to the frame of reference of the environment which moves around it, but as soon as the environment stops moving so does the cube relative to the environment, because it doesn't have a velocity of its own, if the other side of the portal went around the cube and then kept moving, then cube would fly away as it would have no time to fall down since the environment is moving away from it, but the other side of the portal has no momentum, it has no acceleration in respect to the frame of reference it is in, it is stationary, as soon as the portal stops moving around the cube so does the other side of the portal stop moving and since the cube has no velocity of its own it will simply fall down, case closed, class dismissed, you get a big fat F on your test, try again next year

>> No.15922557 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1664845197862262.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15922557

is it a branch of philosophy

>> No.15096423 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1670412728681305.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15096423

>>15096414
It is far more simple, it's just that retards assume that alien civilizations are hyper-advanced and should be zooming around the universe like in their favourite scifi stories, when the reality is that any alien civilization is most likely as advanced, or less advanced, than us. Couple that with the fact that habitable planets are rare and super far away from us, any radio signals would take thousands if not millions of years to reach anyone, add to that the fact that any civilization looking at Earth through a telescope would see light from thousands to millions of years in the past, they might not even realize any civilization or life exists on this planet and the same applies to us.
Life is not a scifi fantasy, it's extremely mundane and limited and any alien civilization is most likely operating on the exact same laws of physics as us, simple as that.

>> No.14613281 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1656297593351.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14613281

How do you guys feel about the cancer vaccine

>> No.11854467 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1563926603568.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11854467

>>11854368
>you haven't even considered the actual posts that make arguments, so how about you do that first and then we'll talk?
Lol, I have and then you proceeded to ask me who i vote for. I should have ignored you from that point on
>>11854372
>kek who the fuck are you to decide that?
Am I supposed to say "Apollo" or something? Who is this magical deity you believe in that you think has to make this sort of "use of math decision"? Math is a language, idiot.
>You don't even understand simple arithmetic here and you think you get to say what are and what aren't useful results?
Not when you're counting something that doesn't exist then no.

>>11854379
>scientists, doctors, you know, the people who actually know shit about how to handle a pandemic
>they've done so well, our tiktok dancers

>not shitheels like you. you are irrelevant
Okay, Jesus. I have original sin and am deemed "non essential".

>>11854386
>begging/baiting for answers irrelevant to the discussion.
Pathetic

>> No.11802262 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1584565098032.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11802262

>>11800284
>I'm sorry, I got a tighter offer than your ass.

>> No.11797952 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1536290634294.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11797952

>>11795065
topology is important to all of those fields
combinatorics is an application of algebra
graph theory is an application of combinatorics

>> No.11686747 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1563926603568.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11686747

>>11686669
meaning it didn't prove shit Neither did the null results of all the experiments after it.

>>11686683

>I take it you definitely didn't go to college for physics huh

And that has what to do with what I just said?

>> No.11591679 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1586822736032.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11591679

>>11591664
I realize that you gigabrainlet. Nothing is perfect but only analogues wouldn't be detected, which are still radically safer than research chemicals. But the point of the kit is to be as safe as possible and minimize risk, nothing is foolproof.

>> No.9784098 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1524941706835.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9784098

>>9784092
>>9784072
you were just too slow

>> No.9704461 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 360x238, 1524891551692.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9704461

>>9704434
>couldn't even qualify for Mensa

The Cattell B scale SD is 24; on a normal scale (SD 15), your IQ would be about 128.

I figure this is a bait thread, but you ought to know in case it's not.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]