/sci/ - Science & Math

Its nice to see the breath of life back into him, he was looking rough back in the day. He got his vigor back when he got the recognition he deserves.

>>15491998
>There are no real disagreements in the foundations of mathematics.
The War in Heaven doesnt involve humans, mortal.

>>15324349
>beside you
I've never made a thread about him before. He teaches novel approaches to Pure Mathematics.

Maybe...oh, idk...attend some lectures. I have. 50 or so hours worth.

>>15279495
1-800-GET-REAL

>>15261035
I know, right, this is the place to take one's theory and shove it down these pseudo-academics's throats. If they refute you, you never had a good theory.

If they only talk about the man...then the theory is sound, proceed to the campus and shitpost there.

>>15254377
>We can disagree with Wildburger
>We
No, my work concurs with much of his, specifically the errors in the definitions of fundemental mathematics. Dedekind cut as well but the core theory aligns with mine and I expand upon it where he does not as I see it as simply one division among many, not *the only one*. Rational Trig is neat shit too. Deep understanding of historical maths and their difference between [[[modern mathematics]]].

Youre....not a real Mathematican, are you?

>>15240117
>another N.J. Wildberger
Maybe if you used REAL people in the video...you've been dedekind cut'd.

Goodbye.

>>15232281
Ol' Whilin' Wilderbeaster. Dedicant cut is arbitrary but the viewpoint of a non-1 first numeral is highly interesting and foundational to our views of numbers.

Norman is the only other mathematician Ive seen that found the same definitional errors.

I found it because I tried to reinvent algebra/arithmatic and found play in it, but only when pushed to its breaking point (pure math).

>>15068626
>I'm 99% sure it's schizo
>Just...
Youre not a Mathematician. Youre a fan of Maths.

Didnt read the rest, you done dunced yerself, my boy.

>>15017032
>Would this be worth studying?
I mastered (basically) all the other shapes, manipulating them to very high dimensions, and if doing one is easy then they all become easy.

...but Spheres are...a bit different, so its not a field Ive "devoured". Ive been telling people that want a fresh area to make discoveries its in Spherical geometry. The last time it was focused by mathematicians was like pre-Victorian era.

Even "Stormin" Nornam Wilberger says as much, that its a lost "art".

>>15010089
>Math wasn't invented until Banach
Lol, you silly goose.

>>14964441
Just...