/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8875700
Why? Literally search climate change in the catalog and look at the other threads where this same misleading, garbage graph from Christy / Spencer has been posted, then look in the archive and see how many times it's been posted and been refuted over and over again.

the tl;dr version is that Christy / Spencer made several "errors" (by that I mean he did it on purpose to manipulate the result) in producing this graph in order to skew the results and make them support his own political agenda.

Keep in mind that this graph is not peer reviewed, and is not from a scientific paper or anything like that, it's just something Christy / Spencer essentially made up for his own shitty website, and it spread from there to all the typical denier websites who took it as gospel.

Here's some good reads on what exactly is wrong with these graphs, the first one in particular which goes over the process Christy used to create his result and why it's flawed.

https://ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/john-christy-richard-mcnider-roy-spencer-flat-earth-hot-spot-figure-baseline/
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2016/05/comparing-models-to-the-satellite-datasets
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2014/02/roy-spencers-latest-deceit-and-deception.html
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2014/05/roy-spencer-grows-even-wearier.html

It's hilarious that climate change deniers engage in such shady tactics like manipulating the data to fit their own agenda, when that's exactly what they love to accuse actual climate scientists of doing with no evidence, yet we have evidence right here of someone that is looked up to and seen as an "authority" on climate to deniers manipulating the data for his own political agenda. How ironic.

>>8524048
>didn't read anything
no.

>>7528144
>imprecise measurements of a tiny number of soldiers from 60 years ago to support the debunked notion that fat causes heart disease

Sorry, but an image macro and name-calling can't erase the fact that you're wrong.

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/2014/03/19/dietary-fat-and-heart-disease-study-is-seriously-misleading/

>>7284568

>RCP 8.5

>>7089702

>Better data supplantation has occurred. Pic related.

HAHAHAHAHA

>>7057593

>>6866526

>>6866501

>satellite

>>6841737
>>6842026
>Too bad Spencer is a creationist, no one takes him serious for it.

Yeah. It's creationism that's hurting his credibility.

>>6593209