/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9757812
I always enjoy conceptually every person being able to do the same thing as everyone else, but that as a basis of verification that something is true seems a bit far sighted to me. While of course the rule set for relativity is air tight due to how it can explain the phenomena we witness to a degree of accuracy that is sufficient as it has been verified so much. The situation here is that I am interested in electrical transients, which is a subject that in the ether theory offers a very detailed and in depth explanation to imo. I should like to know, what do you classify Tesla's work as then? Agreed that a large majority of his results have yet to be reproduced publicly but does that inherently make them false? Corruption within the field of science seems extremely likely to me, which colors me jaded towards a widespread approach to "what one must be able to verifiy, we must all be able to verify." Conceptually it is nice to believe we all have the same potential to manifest phenomena of all kind but surely this is not the case. Ideally the instructions should yield every human to the same result via assigned laws of nature yet. User error continues to be the most grand action amidst technological growth personally. So I find it unfitting to claim everyone may do as tesla did without the same setting he had thus the ether a myth.

On the flip side, I agree that in time we will find ways for it to be so reproducible and understood however that time is not now. I believe there will consecutive sensible results paired with a refined method of creating said results.

There are some findable results painting a very different understanding of things, but I do feel personal experimentation is of the utmost importance.

Image to show that the concepts and theory start on a somewhat literal and similar page, but the take on it is different slightly.