/sci/ - Science & Math

•IQ only alludes to some aspects of intelligence, proven by the fact that a lot of high IQs are had, yet humanity is still amongst dense mediocrity.
•Genetics are hugely overestimated in relevance. Genes are some 99.5% similar, potentially 100%, somewhat often activated and deactivated based on behaviors, and are thusly passable to offspring. Energy levels, personality, social interest and investment, skillfulness, and other aspects of genetic expression are basing on nutrition (of which, "full variety" is some 1% of diets, and a similar rarity amongst scholarly articles – evidencing both huge potential for humanity, and the minimalistic and further plausibility of associations / results.
•Basically every "thing" (of simple industrial availability, and personal health and entertainment) is solved. Prevention and cures for cancer and tangle-diseases are already available (though this actually public). Food availability, eternal youth, objectivity in standards, energy production, and other "innovations" are already solved. (Researching modern AI began in the 1950s. Google has an example 11 billion parameters "for loading, preprocessing, mixing, and evaluating datasets" on Github. Et al. ..)

Each industry / "life genre" has its specifics, and knowledge / performance is really simple.

>>11099916
The points I was making are very generalized and fundamental, partially because, it's not my job convincing you the relevance of scholarly niches existing.

>>11091424
A). Not an argument / topical.. >>>/global/rules/6
B). Scientific objectivity and mathematical precision are extremely great for quality (and are already evidenced ..).