/sci/ - Science & Math

So i just found a job.
I'm quite delighted doing so. At a univeristy, conducting research for the treatment of a disease caused by protozoan the parasite Leishmania.

Anyone here with experience of something alike ?

The people who "care" about you only do so because it would hurt their chance at spreading their own DNA if you left.
There is no genuine "caring" and once you'll die they'll forget about you very quickly because you're then useless.
Meanwhile you feel like shit because you know you're a burden on the human race, a massive piece of shit.
It is your evolutionary duty to off yourself, for the greater good, no matter what the entourage wants.
Because if you reproduce you'll have tainted the whole genepool with your DNA by 5000AC.

Biology is just applied chemistry, and therefore, a science.

Report'd cuz u dum.

Except that book clearly lays out the evidence and logic in support of its argument. Dawkins doesn't ask for belief or blindly assert unfounded ideas. He simply forms a cohesive and compelling case.

The problem is the 10 is actually worth 16.11.

So you have 10*10 = 100 outcomes.
You generate the array of all these outcomes.
Then you divide the sum of every combination by how many they are.
You divide something by 100.

That something, that sum, is max(1,1)+max(1,2)+...+max(1,16.11)+...+max(2,16.11)+max(16.11,16.11)
So you do:
the finite sum of max(i,j), with i=1 to 9, and j=1 to 9 (on wolfram, "sum (sum max(i,j) j=1 to 9) i=1 to 9" = 525)
+ the finite sum of max(16.11,i) with i = 1 to 9 = 9 * 16.11
+ the finite sum of max(i, 16.11) with i = 1 to 9 = 9 * 16.11
+ the finitesum of max(16.11, 16.11) = 16.11
All that shit = 525+9*16.11+9*16.11+16.11 = 831.09
You divide all that shit by 100 = 8.31

Your page says: 8.31
For 3 roll it'd be

Maria Bamford is hilarious though.

Ok /sci/ I have a question.
I was watching khan academy and I notice that lets say you have -2x+3=4+3x . On khan academy they solve this by saying you add to both sides 2x so it is like -2x +2x +3 = 4+3x +2x and then they get 3=4+5x .
I have always thought of this as taking it to the other side and giving it the opposing symbol (plus in this case). But everyone I know solves it by doing khans method , so I am asking is there a difference and will this change my future math interpretations at all? Thank for reading this tl;dr

Might not have too many britfags on at this hour, but I'll give it a go anyway.

I applied to study physics at both UCL and Bristol and have had exactly the same condititonal offer from both, which I'm quite confident I can meet.

What the pros and cons of both unis?
UCL seems to be the 'better' university on paper, but I really liked the atmosphere and abundance of open space in Bristol. Wat do.

pic unrelated

>>1830977
>you just dont want to accept the fact that it is a waste of money.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_mining
>At 1997 prices, a relatively small metallic asteroid with a diameter of 1 mile contains more than $20 trillion US dollars worth of industrial and precious metals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_Earth_Objects#Near-Earth_asteroids
>These are objects that have a near-Earth orbit, yet far enough from the Sun so that the surface material never evaporates, having a diameter over 50 metres. As of May 2010[update], 7,075 near-Earth asteroids are known,[15] ranging in size up to ~32 kilometers (1036 Ganymed).[17] The number of near-Earth asteroids over one kilometer in diameter is estimated to be 500 - 1,000.

The space program can repay itself some billion times from our solar s ystem alone. You're a fucking narrowminded idiot.

>>1306725
I love your argument. Okay, I'm an idiot. Now, where's the argument?

Obvious samefag is obvious

>>1030303
People make hotels out of ice.