/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16062327
>Events with a 0% probability of occurring can occur.
Then it's not 0%, Even if it's a simple on/off, yes/no, either/or question an event with 49,999% probability does not occur
Let 0% - 50% = not occur
Let 50% - 100% = occur
Only a perfect 50% the event can either occur or not if the question is only 2 sided like the question is (occurs or not)

>no fundamental breakthrough in physica since splitting the atom
>no fundamental breakthrough in mathematics since game theory & FFT

why is it that /sci/ constantly looks down on biology and denigrates it when biology continues to provide us breakthroughs (such as gene editing) even to this day? I am pretty sure that if people weren't so biased they would value nobel prize in pjysiology or medicine far more than nobel prize in physics which to this date is awarded for proving theorems derived in 60s of phonomena observed before 40s

Whenever I talk about science on other boards I get tons of replies decrying science, logic and facts. Are all of these just shitposts or do you guys like... ACTUALLY think science is stupid?
How can someone say "observable facts are wrong" with a straight face?

>H2O

>>15284186
What's a Bacon cypher, and where should I start to learn cool encryption stuff?

>>15144778
>set with associative operation and identity element

>>15135614
Why does everything that you can't see with your own eyes, look like a computer graphic? Do we live in a simulation, after all?

>>15127242
>>15127273
Don't think we didn't notice

>>15038113
There are early Christian writers that support it too anon.

>>15025425
I was gonna point that out, have a (you)

>>15002051
let's say you have a stick and is very long. Let further assume you would turn this stick around. Given it's long enough (for example it reaches to Alpha Centauri) would the end of the stick travel faster than light? And what about laser pointers?

[math]2 \equiv 0 \mod{2}[/math]

[math](\vec{n}, \vec{m} \in \mathbb{R}^3 \wedge r, s \in \mathbb{R}) \implies [\exists\, \vec{a}, \vec{b} \in \mathbb{R}^3 \wedge \vec{a} \neq 0\, \exists\, \vec{p} \in \mathbb{R}^3 :\\ (n_{1}p_{1} + n_{2}p_{2} + n_{3}p_{3} = r \wedge m_{1}p_{1} + m_{2}p_{2} + m_{3}p_{3} = s) \iff (\exists\, \lambda \in \mathbb{R} : \vec{p} = \lambda \vec{a} + \vec{b})].[/math]

>got a double major in math and physics
>took grad level courses in analysis, algebra, QM, topology, and more
>all I really remember well are some basic analysis/algebra/QM/stat mech concepts like properties of compactness, Sylow theorems, and the Planck distribution function

How did this happen? Am I a brainlet?

>middle of a zoom lecture
>hear a huge bong hit
>"hey if you have your mic open, please mute yourself"

i helped this guy for a month and we keep postponing the aortic valve implantation cause he keeps getting worse after getting slightly better

prolly the last time he comes back from cardiology to coronaric icu

dont think he'll get transfered again to cardiology after i see him

this is it for him /b/ros, he was really good guy

B.G. i think this time you shall give up man

sorry i tried my best

>>14680772

not him but as what's already said

>>14675427

this is what you will do

you will either formally challenge the theory

or you will continue to rant on anonymous image boards kicking and screaming like a retard

/sci/, is it true that no virus in history has ever been isolated?