/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5911277
this image is pretty relevant to this thread

especially "scorns others' efforts"

can maturity be measured/tested?

Would it be correct to learn Discrete mathematics before I learn statistics?

I already know the basics of statistics, Z, T, two T, ANOVA. But, I realized that Discrete mathematics has set theory and other mathematical formula that would help. but, I'm not ENTIRELY sure what is in it.

ether way, As I originally posted. Does it matter what I learn first?

Pic unrelated.

This one's for you guys

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/a_professor_speaks_out_mo
ney_has_corrupted_our_global_warming_debate
Australian physicist Professor Brian J O’Brien has worked on the Apollo moon missions. In this interview with the ABC, just 8:15 from the end, he suddenly cuts loose on man-made global warming, and commits a series of heresies that pin back the ears of the interviewer.

- It’s been wildly exaggerated. When he first started researching the topic, “I got rather frightened at the exaggerations that were going around.”

- It’s “certainly not proven” than man is largely to blame for any warming.

- “The sad part was that there were no senior scientists that were independent” in the field.

- He discovered that “the funding for climate change research was only going to what you call true believers and when that happens inevitably you get a bias”.

- An Australian professor of physics told him he “completely” supported his concern but had to keep his team of 65 researchers going with work, and “the only funding I can get for them and to get their PhDs is greenhouse funding from Canberra or whereever”.

- “For 20 years people have been indoctrinated with the abuse of language” so that “climate change” is meant to suggest that all change is man-made. Of course, there’s climate change. That’s not the question

- He’s worried we’re going ahead of the world in cutting emissions.

>>2907207
to many, but i learned to let it go. Who am I to tell people how to live their lives

Hey atheists,


picture related
~with love, agnostics

What do you think is necessary for psychology to evolve into a real field of science instead of the incomplete, inaccurate monstrosity it is now?
If you were in charge of tending to the psychological needs of the population of the world in general and you had unlimited funds, how would you improve the field?
Which studies would you perform? Would you monitor psychologists?
How can you better psychology?

Being greedy isn't exactly a atrribute of intelligence more egoism

A little survey for /sci/

Which modifier goats describe you.

You must use at least 1 red goat for every 1 green goat.

I puzzle to peer which personalities are perceived pervasively.

>>2251161

Im coming here not knowing shit about shit

Sorry, that wont help