/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5648016
>direct descendant
>direct
as opposed to what??
an 'indirect decendant'?
wtf is that!??

you're either a decendant, or you're not. there is no direct/indirect

Recently me and my friend has a discussion about the definition of time. He said "distance is time" and I asked him to explain, also saying that distance is only the space between 2 points. We then continued to discuss until he said "So distance is how much energy it takes to get from one point to another. Again this implies there is a point in which it will stop". I was very confused by this and tried to prove him wrong by the same methods I'd been using, but he had to go. What I want to know is where is he getting this idea from, and who is correct?