[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12270671 [View]
File: 91 KB, 626x530, skulls and races.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12270671

>> No.11526111 [View]
File: 91 KB, 626x530, human biodiversity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11526111

>>11525430
Absolute bullshit.

>> No.10311528 [View]
File: 91 KB, 626x530, human biodiversity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10311528

>>10311523
Race is far from being just skin deep lol. Simply because the borders of something is harder to define doesn't mean its not a real thing. If you actually wanted to put borders around species that would be very hard, the divergences just occurred much farther back.

>> No.10058711 [View]
File: 90 KB, 626x530, qwe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10058711

>>10053731
Amerindian skull is the best.

>> No.9143309 [View]
File: 106 KB, 626x530, IMG_2038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9143309

How effective is this method in determining who exactly a person was in racial terms? How many times has this worked, and what percentage of cases has this worked?

I'm wanting to know because I keep hearing people say that race is only a skin color, however race can be also determined by bone structure as well.

Is this standard procedure for forensic anthropology in the US, and if so, how effective is it? I heard that it can be confusing to identify a mixed race individual by simply looking at the lower jaw bone, but does it work? I know this is a very politically incorrect question to ask, but I want to hear an experts side of the story.

>> No.8165558 [View]
File: 90 KB, 626x530, 6a00d83451dfb969e20112790b003128a4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165558

>>8165547
So because I acknowledge cosmetic differences between the races, I'm a nazi?

>> No.8157823 [View]
File: 90 KB, 626x530, 6a00d83451dfb969e20112790b003128a4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8157823

>>8157721
Clearly we're different species. Just look how not similar they are.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]