/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12319187
>We akready have one.
So stop letting the heat out of the house and close the window Timmy!

>The heater doesn't lose heat, the house does.
YES

>The insulation prevents heat from being lost by the house
Which is what I've said countless times now.

>which causes heat to increase
So dumb. No. It prevents it from being lost, as you just said. There is no "increase" in the 100% output coming out of the fucking heater! There is this disconnect here where you think that not losing something is gaining something. No. It's not the stock market. It's not an investment. If you have something and give it away, you don't magically get more of that something. How fucking stupid are you?

>I corrected the analogy.
That stupid apparently. Disregarding the rest of your pointless gibberish.

>>11194224

>>Destroyed. By "accident".

>>11194225
>>11194226
>>11194232

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/20/apollo-11-moon-landing-tapes-sell-at-sothebys-for-1point8-million.html

https://www.foxnews.com/science/apollo-11-original-recordings-sold-at-auction

https://techcrunch.com/2019/07/22/original-apollo-11-landing-videotapes-sell-for-1-8m/

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/02/us/nasa-intern-moon-landing-footage-sothebys-auction-trnd/index.html

What am I missing?

Lets completely forget and fuck down the idea of it having historical relevance. Why would this be allowed to take place.

One additional bread crumb, ill give to you on a silver platter; There are no stars in the film or pictures for a simple reason. It could not be accurately replication, precisely, without actually being present on the moon. However. It would be possible, especially with future technology to trace the footage back to see if it measured up to where the astronauts were at the time of the filming, pictures, and landing.

>>11036150
>It's a quantity
of what?
>>11036157
Is this circular reasoning day on /sci/ or something? Is there some meme I'm not getting or something?