/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9173000
>There is no genetic definition of race.

True, but we should change that. Why is "racism" blamed, when a low-IQ, warrior-gene-carrying black male gets shot by police? Having clear genetic boundaries could make identifying the problem much, much easier.

>Heritability of IQ itself does not imply differences in heritability between races (e.i. blacks have "bad genes" for intelligence)

Once again, true, but that does not rule out the possibility that blacks due, indeed, have "bad genes for intelligence." A lot of evidence supports that idea.

>Science is not a liberal/jewish conspiracy or coverup. No is being paid or threatened to lie.

It doesn't matter if it is the liberals, the Jews, the deep state, or just general human ignorance, this anti-science attitude has to stop.

>Sure, you can lose your job... for saying things that are unscientific.

See >>9172700 He must be really "unscientific."

Pic related: you

>>9164942
People dogmatically held onto the idea that the Earth must be at the center of the universe... This kind of thinking is not new. My wording was quite clear.

>>9164944
This is a waste of time? What a brainlet response.