[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11325633 [View]
File: 65 KB, 599x595, stemwomen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11325633

>>11324790
I think it's because it's easier to push an already recognized icon than to create a new icon, coupled with the fact radfems both don't ACTUALLY care and don't actually know anything. It's like the usual comic strip, picrel.

>> No.11297925 [View]
File: 65 KB, 599x595, stemwomen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11297925

>>11297606
Feminist will deny this truth but don't let them.

>> No.10803743 [View]
File: 65 KB, 599x595, stemwomen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10803743

>>10802823
because while men are getting real degrees, women are getting degrees in whining about imaginary sexism.

What I find interesting is that, despite all the evidence that Gender Studies is very blatantly and explicitly sexist against men, there's no discussion around the fact that 95% of Gender Studies students are women.

>> No.9649334 [View]
File: 64 KB, 599x595, stemwomen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9649334

>>9648698
Maybe women should get good then

>> No.9495674 [View]
File: 64 KB, 599x595, stemwomen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9495674

>>9488907
I predict great success for Steamteam5 in the "A" in STEAM but great failure in the "S","T","E", AND "M" just like the rest of feminazidom and for the same reason - women aren't interested in STEM.

Pic related

>> No.8189065 [View]
File: 64 KB, 599x595, stemwomen[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8189065

No women have a problem with science.

>> No.7765032 [View]
File: 64 KB, 599x595, stemwomen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7765032

http://boysmeneducation.com/feminisation-and-decline-of-physics-a-level/

>Here’s an illustration of what you get if you let post-modernists loose on science: from Sandra Harding, Ref.3, so-called feminist philosopher and philosopher of science,
"Why is it not as illuminating and honest to refer to Newton’s laws as “Newton’s rape manual” as it is to call them “Newton’s mechanics”?"

Pic related

>> No.7495145 [View]
File: 65 KB, 599x595, women in STEM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7495145

>>7494213
It's mostly women that get them. Women get something like 60% of college degrees in the US, but men are still getting more STEM degrees, especially the legit ones like engineering. So the soft majors are probably like 70/30 women. And the complete bullshit majors like Women's Studies are almost entirely women.
So the question is "why do women get worthless degrees?" It's because they can. They don't need a job. Despite their bitching about equality, most women still want the man to be the breadwinner. She'd rather work an easy job in an easy field and marry a guy who works his ass off.

>> No.7451047 [View]
File: 65 KB, 599x595, 1438952861639.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7451047

>>7445471

>> No.7447666 [View]
File: 64 KB, 599x595, somestuf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7447666

>>7447658
Sounds about right

It feels kinda like pic related. Girls who actually work in Science are pretty great tho.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]