/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15992191
Here's what the IPCC says:
Worst case scenario is 1.7cm/y, ending in a 95cm rise by the end of the century.
Best case scenario (carbon taxes, further government interference in the market, bug eating etc) is 0.2cm/y, ending in a 25cm rise by the end of the century.
8.5x and 3.8x difference respectively.

Being less charitable taking the averages its a 3x cm/y difference and 1.7x times total sea level rise.
1 meter by 2100 doesn't strike me as disaster. The difference between the scenarios is even less alarming.

>>16014133

>>15916295
pic got dropped

>>15896239
I did, and as you can see its a fucking nothing burger.

>>15772487
This. Even the IPCC agrees that the difference between doing nothing and destroying our way of life is 31cm

>>15749230
nothing burger

>30cm difference between doing nothing, and burning down the economy

>>15742524
funniest part is the IPCC admits that the difference between climate communism (RCP 2.6) and capitalism (RCP 8.5) is negligible
>31cm difference

>>15701067
>blah blah blah eat the bugs
yeah thats nice. Reality is that even according to the IPCC sea level rise is a total fucking nothingbuger.

RCP8.5 is AT MOST 3.8x more sea level rise than RCP2.6.
RCP2.6 is 44cm, where RCP8.5 is 75cm.

We'll just build new houses inland instead of replacing shore front property.

>sea level rise has accelerated since about 1970 and will continue to
1.6cm a year, at most.

>>15656972
A lot fucking more than what climate change is gonna do by 2100.

>less than a single meter by 2100
>not even an inch a year by 2100
And this is from the IPCC too. Climate change might be happening, but it is a non issue.
Yet another nothing burger used by the kikes to control everyone.

>>15646637
don't care

>>15606819
Why should I care? Why should the state abolish private property and the free market to counter or deal with the consequences of climate change?

>>15581634
Nowhere. It's just change well within human's ability to adapt to it.