/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6917184
>Continuum-fags have to justify why the nature restricts everyone from accessing beyond a certain finite scale of everything -- time, space, energy etc.?
[citation needed]

Let me remind you where we left off. I repeatedly asked you for a definition of discrete and continuous such that the following holds:
-A space is either discrete or continuous, but never both
-The definition only uses finite mathematics, no ZF, choice or reals allowed
-The universe is 'discrete', without a doubt, so not based on empirical (thus falsifiable) hypotheses
-From the latter, the natural numbers 'magically' arise
-Somehow, this must be relevant for the foundation of modern mathematics.

Good luck

>>6857856

>>6835434
>Be OP
>Walk in field
>Know nothing of building houses but heard that lots of houses build in the past have collapsed
>See farmers building large barn, they seem to have been working for a long time now
>They say they've already reconstructed large portions of the barn because, while building, they learned that certain constructions proved to be unstable. Some say they'll probably never finish completely.
>Laugh and point. don't you dorks know that all houses can collapse?
>Give them solid advise: destroy everything and start again from the foundations upwards, using no knowledge gained by experience thus far whatsoever
>Farmers cheer and denounce me their God
>Finally the recognition I deserve, feels good man
>Still haven't build a house myself, ever

>>6774986
>Given the premises that evolution is false, evolution is an unlikely theory