/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12735720
>Well, thanks for proving there was an impact.
Evidence =/= proof

>Purple Dot - When I think the impact occurred
No one cares.

>Red Dot - When I think the warming effect from the impact ended
Why is that where the warming effect ended when the temperature was stable before during and after that point? The warming ended 10000 years ago. Get over it.

>Green Dot - When the global warming cycle actually started.
What is this cycle and what causes it?

>Because the heat increase was above what the low activity cooling could counteract
What heat increase? What low activity cooling?

>and because the starting point of the warming phase was at an already high temperature point.
Doesn't explain shit.

>I'm not, you're just arguing semantics
Oh wow, very convenient how contradicting yourself is just semantics.

>I'm arguing the space between the purple and red dots was warming caused by the YDI
Most of that space isn't even warming, so again, you're spouting nonsense. And the starting point is just a spot you arbitrarily chose with no evidence. No one cares.

>not global warming from the Milankovitch cycle
Then go ahead and disprove the Milankovitch cycle.


>Showing me how the milankovish cycle lines up with the end of the last ice age would really btfo me instead of being insulting.
Pic related. Thanks for admitting you're BTFO.

>>But Milankovitch cycles can’t explain all climate change that’s occurred over the past 2.5 million years or so. And more importantly, they cannot account for the current period of rapid warming Earth has experienced since the pre-Industrial period (the period between 1850 and 1900), and particularly since the mid-20th Century.
Is this supposed to support your contention that Milankovitch cycles didn't cause the last interglacial? Current warming =/= warming 10000 years ago. What are you trying to say?

>>7702762
Daily reminder that climate science on our timescales is a meme

>>7316927
Playing devil's advocate then, is a naturally warming earth a good thing?

What does /sci/ think about a master's thesis on palaeoclimate proxies using stable isotope geochemistry and biostratigraphy?

Should I go for it?