[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.6540736 [View]
File: 310 KB, 1280x1300, faf3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6540736

>>6538449
If time were linear it would be Repetitive.
If time were cyclical it were Fractale.

In this case, time is just observation of force moving, for example universe expansion has attribute of time so we perceive time as linear. Time is really just an attribute that something exist, so this "Time" doesn't exist but the concept does.

>> No.6535290 [View]
File: 310 KB, 1280x1300, faf3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6535290

Hi just a quick question about physics..

I had this quite self-explanatory question on physics exam: "What decides the frequency?" answer was: "Source of the frequency" , I was like.. no shit sherlock.. But then I started to wonder (and googling) what actually controls the frequency..

For example we have a 10f (frequency) lazor how can we control it to be 9f (frequency), can we control it anyway? What in this lazor decides that it is its frequency?

I know what frequency is, and its pretty impossible to control frequency without the right equipment for example red lazer cant be green lazer etc.. But like what the hell of a kind question (in that exam) was that in the first place; what controls the frequency??

>> No.6452875 [View]
File: 310 KB, 1280x1300, faf3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6452875

>>6452857
lolwut... Check through the wormhole ,it's scientific documentary where every episode is done with different professors of the field. With quality. Thats why to make documentaries, quality.

>> No.6442527 [View]
File: 310 KB, 1280x1300, faf3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6442527

>>6441996
Was talking about e=mc^2
Not momentum. (derivation of it.)

Pay attention.

Let me rephrase, can there be energy without momentum? Explain why, because im too tired to make your thinking work.

Also when you try to argument, try to disprove not show something obvious and say "because this detail was wrong your whole formula is wrong", well usually it goes like that but when there is words instead of formulas..., you can figure the rest.

>> No.6410754 [View]
File: 310 KB, 1280x1300, faf3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6410754

>>6410694
:D Go study yourself.

I have studied my part, I am interpreting very complex things in the simplest form which is Truth. (According to top scientists; If you can explain something to the simplest mind it means you can completely understand it.)

I don't need you Phd in fysics neither mathematics.

Sorry for sounding overconfident, but thats the game in the world. ;)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]