[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15255964 [View]
File: 485 KB, 1672x1722, Looking at Nature as a Computer - looking-at-nature.pdf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15255964

>>15255895
whoops
grentext fail here
>>15255952
should be
>That is exactly what the physical world is. It's just that the the reality is the totality of the set of all successive states of the set of all subjective data streams rendered to the set of all experiencers immersed in the physical (virtual) reality. And so the states appear relative and are based on vantage point. So there is no 'objective' passage of the time (cycles) from the vantage point of those immersed in the reality, hence the relativity of simultaneity. From the NON-LOCAL gods eye view, there is an outer objective time. Either way, the cycles are finite. He was right. And if you are not
and then non green texted statement

"And if you are not looking at the universe from an info info theoretic point of view, you are just going to end up coming to the wrong conclusions about all of these things and sounding dumb, just FYI."

>> No.15250348 [View]
File: 485 KB, 1672x1722, Looking at Nature as a Computer - looking-at-nature.pdf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15250348

>>15250089
I can give you the needed areas of research and some resources you the needed resources. Start with the discovery of entropy and the lead up to ultraviolet catastrophe. This is the start of the break down of the continuous classical models. A good paper. The title is 'looking at nature as a computer', see pic. It ends up being that nature is the OUTPUT of a computer, not the computer itself, but the paper is still useful.
https://people.csail.mit.edu/nhm/looking-at-nature.pdf

>> No.15182107 [View]
File: 485 KB, 1672x1722, Looking at Nature as a Computer - looking-at-nature.pdf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15182107

>>15182082
By the way, NOTHING infinite can EVER be demonstrated or empirically shown to be the case. This goes for infinite divisibility of space, matter, time, infinite past. ALL evidence is to the counter. The trend has consistently moved towards finitism and discreteness. See pic.

>> No.15162273 [View]
File: 485 KB, 1672x1722, Looking at Nature as a Computer - looking-at-nature.pdf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15162273

>>15162249
>are you analysis-phobic?
No, see here
>>15162234
>Number theory, integers not analytic, though that won't hurt.
There's something about studying these subjects which do something to my mind and make me sharper. Particularly mathematical logic. This is ME though. Maybe the same will not work for you.

>> No.15033277 [View]
File: 485 KB, 1672x1722, Looking at Nature as a Computer - looking-at-nature.pdf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15033277

>>15031954
Yeah true. Not in the physical world anyways. It's pixelated, discrete, digital. Should be a big clue that the physical world is an output of info processing.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]