/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8657455
I'll use as many dimensions as I wish for my constructions. You can't stop me.

You can't even hear me or see me, 3-boi

>>6981947
Dimensions aren't something you can open a portal to. Can you open a portal to the second dimension? the first?

OK /sci/, I'm no physicist or metaphysicist or anything, but I saw pic related and it seems like a really interesting expansion on the Anthropic Principle, if only I understood what it meant. Bear in mind it could be total bullshit TM, and I get the feeling that's what you're going to say.

>What does it mean to have more than 1 time dimension?
>Why is it unstable to have 2 or 4+ spatial dimensions with one dimension of time?
>Are the spatial and temporal axes merely inversions of one another?

Thanks.

>>6398452

How would time and its apparent properties be different in 4 spatial dimensions? Would it be the same?

Is this chart based on actually physics/mathematics? Or is it just made up? If so, can someone explain why it's true?

That "Tachyon only" thing makes me feel like it's bullshit.

>>6304466
see
>>6304238

>>6266919
you don't think you should?

>>6201766
And now its mine.