/sci/ - Science & Math

actually now that I think about it why doesn't it work for the naturals? any number you construct using his method would be in the naturals

>>11002256

>>10989172
>So make of that what you will
What mean of this sentence?

>>10990247
>>10989838
same brainlet

>>10992951
>>10990266
>>10989612
>>10989181
brainlet

>>10132968
So, I'm still brainlet for gaining my "understanding" of these topics from his books, but I could be worse, right?

>>10025814
I'm sorry, but I think you're not appreciating the depth of my stupidity. It's a critical case, near terminal. I think I would need to stack many boxes to reach this counter top.

I just want to get my mouth around this Riemann business, so I require slapping with the meatiest analog for the problem, and likely a refresher in, oh, all of mathematics.

Anyway, I know about the /sci/ guide and where to start, and I'll stop taking up room for smart people. Bless you patient, accommodating souls.

>>10017809
Lel you can't even begin to compare new shepherds vertical velocity to F9s horizontal velocity you absolute brainlet.

>i treat infinity as a number and not a concept and try to create arguments and proofs using it

>Richest man in the world
>Still hasn't landed an orbital rocket

kek

>>9877461
Sick, I think they will manage it this time, they got within 50m last time I think and with the new net and whatever improvements they have made to the fairing control system should be enough to nail that last bit.

>ULAs face when

>Muh left right dichotomy
>Haha liberals are so stupid
>Haha conservatives are so stupid

Fuck anyone who promotes this partisan politics which is killing science from all angles. The amount of leftist indoctrination in STEM fields is as disgusting as the conservatives blowing trillions on bombing brown people instead of science. You are all cunts fuck you.

>It's hard so we shouldn't do it
>We need to fix our problems on Earth first

i dont think i understand taylor series