/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14854129
>porn creates conditions where men's brains are tricked into believing they can breed with women who are genetically superior to them
LOL!

INSTANTLY debunked by pic related

Most women in porn are of average attractiveness or below. If you don't think they are then it's because you're like a 3/10. Porn is fake. They select for acting ability, not attractiveness. The actually top attractive women don't need to do porn because their looks stand for themselves. They do Instagram modeling if they are going to be selling their bodies.

Porn is a scapegoat. Outside of addicts, porn is inconsequential to the lives of most. You were probably sheltered or grew up in a society that shames natural things like the nude human body and sexuality. Grow up and take your anti-porn agenda back to /pol/ and /r/nofap.

Let me know if there are any flaws in my logic and reasoning. I'm new to logic, so please correct any errors I make. This was something fun I did to practice. I want to get into discrete mathematics and proof writing soon.

Hook-up apps like Tinder make it really easy for women, even when they're unattractive, to hook-up with horny Chads. People frequently discuss the 80/20 rule when it comes to women hooking up with men. That's what hook-up culture used to be like before the internet. Today, it's closer to 90/10. Unless a woman is drop-dead ugly, she's going to be able to find a Chad who will want to have sex with her through the ever-connected internet.

This study goes on to point out how around 85% of women who use Tinder end up getting laid through the app, while only around 15% of men who use Tinder end up getting laid through the app. I feel like there are a few flaws with this study, though. There were likely a few men who lied about getting laid, or some men who were too embarrassed to partake in the study due to failure to get laid, and there were likely a few women who lied about not getting laid, due to embarrassment associated with a woman being promiscuous. It wouldn't surprise me that the Tinder reality is that only around 10% of the men who use Tinder end up getting laid, while around 90% of women end up getting laid through the app.

>>11453991
>Does dating apps make it harder for men to get woman in general because of the compliments and smorgasbord of dicks pics woman get or it's the same shit as before?
yup. and keep in mind women's hypergamisitc tendencies and delusional thinking. they will all go for chad instead of being realistic because chad keeps them in his harem. pic related. most men are repugnant to women while for men it's a bell curve on how we view women. this is hypergamy in action. if you're not a 9+ as a guy, even if she does go out with you it's like a guy dating a fat chick as a practice gf. she will always be on the look out for a chad opportunity. women are incredibly disloyal and always swinging up branches like monkeys. and we see this play out in the dating apps, where only a small fraction of guys get laid frequently while most don't get anything from it other than frustration.
https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a

couple that with the response rate females get as you pt out they will seem to themselves like hot shit when they are a 7.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.01952.pdf

>Have woman became more aware of men's intentions because of that or they kinda always knew that shit before?
no, in fact they have become more delusional. they believe chad will one day pick them over having a harem. meanwhile they will denigrate genuinely well intentioned "nice guys" based on how some of them react to being spurned. most nice guys are actually pretty simpish and want some girl to treat like their queen. they are in it for more than sex, meanwhile the chads are in it for having non-stop booty calls.

inb4 this is internet and not irl
dating apps are now the most common way people meet nowadays.
https://news.stanford.edu/2019/08/21/online-dating-popular-way-u-s-couples-meet/

>>11388498
you're delusional if you think anyone besides "ok" guy is above a 5, maybe 6 on their best day. they are effeminate, short (remember you can't see how many are below 5'8), not so good looking faces. (remember how women rate men on ok cupid? i included a picture to remind you of how many men they think even qualify as 'average') their girlfriend's would be 4's if they made an effort to get laid. not good looking men. again they can get laid but it will take decent effort - these guys have a mild handicap, never said it was a death sentence.