/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15301803
Exactly
I'm not saying that everything is in vein, just that a lot of time and money (and let's be honest, lives of patients and profits of corporations) were allocated... Let's say inefficiently to be safe from exaggeration.
And the reputation of the institutions took a big hit of course
All done by 1 or 2 people 17 years ago. And it would've been 25 if not more if that researcher didn't get a chance to uncover it.
Thusly,
The questions are:
What do we do now about all the Alzheimer's research we have?
What else is fraudulent, how much research should we check now?
How do we regain the trust in the institutions and should we try at all?
And so on and so on