/sci/ - Science & Math

ayy lmao

It's been, what, 5 years?
He could have easily just built a 100 MW prototype of it.
Could have easily sold hundreds of units to heat houses. Very, very easily built something so big, the excess energy couldn't possibly be explained away. But he didn't. He's still "looking for investors".
> In September 2012 they pulled out from investing in a new version of the E-Cat, a prototype high temperature reactor, after a test by the SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden failed to demonstrate excess output energy because there was more input energy than measured by Rossi.
It's fraud, it's now a fraud and it'll continue to be a fraud for however long people will continue to give money to him.
Just think about it for a moment. You have a device that literally produces orders of magnitude more energy than any conventional fuel source. You don't need sciences stamp of approval to be a millionaire in a few months max with THAT. People become Millionaires by inventing a 0.5% more efficient fuel cycle for cars.
Nobody but the most inept idiot would still be a without a Billion-Dollar energy empire after 5 years.
It's inconceivably how people can believe this bullshit.

Sci I really need cures for "The Secret" and "What the bleep do we know".
Anyone have something?
Videos are helpful it's for the heaviest weed smoker in the world.

>>3694454

>>3263731
You say that like there was no reason why nobody wants to fund it and make money with it's fruits.

>>3263756
You'd think a professor would notice that when he sees it.

a cartoon?
i could go into detail on any point sited in it so ill just adress the first
the largest diamond mine in the world..
sits in canada
unusual events surounding its discovery
female with ink still wet on her geology degree seal
set out on expedition in canada
begged and borrowed herself deeply into debt
ran out of funds nearing the alloted time permited by the legal red tape
most of her crew packed up and went home
she, almost alone, continued until the last few hours of the legaly permited dig time
during which she uncovered what she was looking for

its being done

just like all knowledge of truth; it ain't for everyone

http://www.monroeinstitute.org/

i'll just leave this here

kthxbai

The US government couldn't even supress wikileaks, Apple (arguably, one of the most controlling corporations going) couldn't suppress details of an upcoming product, details of little or no consequence to the world) do you think anyone could suppress something like this?