/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10213886
Here, have a graph that doesn't use retarded shit like atmospheric temperature readings and that it goes back further than the 1850's

Looks like it's time to derail this shit show.

>>9414341
>ipcc
they are proven to have been wrong in the past and have history of lacking integrity. therefore not a credible source

>>9414350
how do you know. from what I see our current warming isnt anything out of the ordinary even in the past few thousand years, let alone the entire history of the planet
>pic related

>>9414364
arguments in your post: zero

>>9414365
this proves you have no fucking clue what you are talking about

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Janice_Lough/publication/221802155_Growth_of_Western_Australian_Corals_in_the_Anthropocene/links/00463526c533be0425000000.pdf
>the larger the temperature rise, the larger coral growth increase
>most coral reefs have increased coral growth in the past decades
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00402312?LI=true
>a decrease in the natural water temperature of Hawaiian reefs would be more harmful to corals than a temperature increase of the same magnitude
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15686
>the maintenance of elevated but near-constant Ωcf in mature coral colonies is not directly influenced by ocean acidification
so obviously optimal growth temperature varies from species but generally favors warm water. ocean acidification does not harm corals, as you can see from my previous picture corals grow near the equator and global warming greatly accelerates growth from those further from the equator and increases the habitat of corals

>>8652015
now lets continue with

>>8651954
>All that melting ice in Greenland, who cares, amirite
yeah because greenland is called GREEN LAND because it was always covered in ice!

Want to do a double degree.
Best thing to do in combination with finance?

>man-made global warming