/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10843699
>another "another IQ thread" post

I see no 'universe' to be derived from in terms of such 'superpowers' but rather than the general belief that the universe simply lacks those powerful power sources that have been used to accomplish super-powers, this is to argue that our current world is simply a continuation after all of the previous and existing superpowers. We cannot have a universe in which these new superpowers are sufficient to bring us all together. At best the universe will be very large which cannot be brought to a halt, so at worst it will continue at a slow rate that it can never reach full efficiency. As a result, this new super-universe will be rendered obsolete.

>>10478196

Did they just destroy the fucking James Webb?? WHY???

Impeach Elon.

>>7083969

>That alone proves my point

Not by a long shot, it is an opinion for sure but you would have to do much more to say that your point is proven, considering that this kind of nature vs. nurture thing is something that even scientific community is struggling to prove or falsify to this day