[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.8901091 [View]
File: 47 KB, 622x843, logical.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901091

I'm confused with how line 5 works in this proof.
Where has ¬A come from? How can ¬A be justified when it has not been assumed?

It uses classical contradiction which I still don't fully understand so I'm hoping someone here knows how it works.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]