/sci/ - Science & Math

I want you to look at my deepest believe under a scientific viewpoint:

During the creation of everything that ever existed on tiny particle or something else that ultimately was the very first thing to ever happen. And that is the closest thing we have to a god.

Is this plausible from any scientific viewpoint or am I talking bullshit right now?

I recently read about how scientists have calculated that there is a possible anomaly that can surface. which is another universe growing inside of our own and over take all of us.

I was browsing around on here and had a thought. what if our universe was an anomaly that grew overtop of another universe?

What if there was no big bang as we think of it?

Would there be any way to tell?

hey /sci/
what do you consider to be the most important theory to prove?? and disprove?
it would be nice to prove timetravel one way or another, it would really cut down on the shitposting, and disprove the universe being a hologram

>>5142909

Help me understand, how did the big bang come from nothing?

Is the timeline an open or closed interval?

What existed before the Big Bang?

Science says nothing existed before the Big Bang, that time didn't exist even.

I find this answer extremely unsatisfactory, and perhaps even dogmatic. It is stuck is a very stubborn view of reality.

Basically what I am trying to ask is, one is one step back from the big bang. What realm of existence is the one that encapsulates our reality?

/Sci/ I am frustrated.

I am an astrophysics/astronomy major in my 3rd year. I also have a very catholic family. I'm home for "easter" weekend and whenever someone asks me my major, they see it as a chance to argue with me.

They say "oh, so do you believe in the big bang theory?" I say "yeah, I mean, theres a lot of evidence and given everything I study it seems to make sense. We just don't have enough technology/knowledge to prove it."

Then they flip a shit like "YOU KNOW THEY CALL IT A THEORY FOR A REASON, RIGHT? ITS JUST A THEORY!!!! WHERE DID ALL THAT MATTER COME FROM ANYWAY?"

I get their implication that lack of knowledge somehow validates the existence of god or something.

I don't like to press my (lack of) religious beliefs on others. What can I even say? Why do they treat religion as science and science as some radical "theory" that only fringe believers accept?

Also, I have government telescope time to observe jupiter's moons tonight in infrared. Its my first government telescope time and I hope it all goes well!

I'm going to work on a video game, it's going to follow events immediately after the Big Bang, the combination of particles, etc. and I want some help from you guys. I have a few questions:

Does the string theory alter the common view on the Big Bang? For example, does it imply that there was some epoch between the Quark epoch and supersymmetry breaking?

Retarded question, but how many (a fuckload or not so much) quarks were there, and is the number of particles increasing to this day?

During the very first second, specifically in the quark epoch, how much space was there, roughly comparing it to the size and amount of quarks?

Visually, would you show the Big Bang as an action-packed explosion or a mere flash?

Hypothetically, could the Big Bang have happened in any other way than we know it (particles combining differently, different laws of physics, different explosions)?

I know these questions are fucked, but I'm not a very bright man. Also, does anyone have any other useful infographics on this topic? Thanks in advance