/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6569575
Perhaps. They were mainly meant for commercial payloads and satellites and, to be frank, had it not been for challenger, they would not have made it out of the 80's.

I am now monitoring the feed again.


So, this picture is unrelated to the discussion.
However, I felt like lightening the mood right now. This was made after the Ares 1-x's initial delay due to triboelectrification issues.

Kathy winters was....
Not liked on /g/ because of her constant abort calls, and as a result we kind of lampooned her a little.

That aside,
SpaceX is currently working toward a 6/12, Launch with a T-0 of 2107-2200L and an alternate date of 6/13, 2045-2138L. Pending Range approval.

F-10 Day 5/29

F-5 Day 6/6

Static Fire 6/9

F-1 Day 6/11
Readiness summaries have been submitted, should any changes to status be noted please report to Mission support as soon as possible.