/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9355746
>I'm genuinely curious: will the effect of gay men not passing on their genes eventually make homosexuality rare on account of evolution running it's course?
No. Fartknockers will always be allowed to indoctrinate children into their mental illness.

>According to science, homosexuality is caused by the feminization of the fetus by the woman's body, and it has been proven that the risk of this happening in a line of boys increases each time one is born.
Science isn't IFLS mumbo jumbo. Also, "the feminization of the fetus by the woman's body" means jack shit.

>There are some mothers who have like five boys in a row and none of them are gay, and some mothers that have two in a row and the younger brother is gay.
That's because of bad parenting and kids growing up in poo pirate-infested cities.

>So if that is the case, won't it stand to reason that the mothers whose wombs don't feminize the fetus as often have more offspring that will go on to have their own kids, as opposed to the gay men producing wombs that have less, and that that trait of producing straight babies will live on and become more prevalent in society, thus making homosexuality less prevalent?
Under this Sweden-inspired soytialist civilization, turd burglars will always find a way not to go extinct as nature has always wanted them to.

>>9035809
>fudge packer faggot ass-blasted by trips of truth
>replies with Wikipedia article with unsourced items, which includes parenting as homosexual behavior and says nothing about frequence of observations
Fartknockers will always impress me.

>>9036065
>Except being gay doesnt hurt anyone
t. bugchaser who takes poppers and treats his cancer with healthcare money that could have helped treat the diseases of people who didn't deserve them