/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5769133
>>5769133
>implying 99.99% of all scienists are not liberal

I think you are in the wrong place. Are you lost?

/sci/, I want to make the largest contribution to the progress of science and technology as possible. How do I get started?

Going to start college in a month and need to get my life plan in order.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former"

Lets examine that thought, shall we?

For human stupidity to be infinite there are a few ways that I see for that to be possible.

The first is that the sum of all human stupidity from the time of the first human ever to exist till the last would be infinite. For that to happen that would require humans to exist for eternity, because if they cease to exist at any point, human stupidity would be finite.


The other option is that the human stupidity of all humans living at any time would be infinite. And since there will always be a finite amount of people at any given time (6,973,738,433 right now) that would mean that there needs to be at least ONE person alive who his stupidity alone is infinite, because the sum of a finite number of finite numbers is itself finite.

The third option is a private case of the 2nd, and that would be that every single human is infinitely stupid.

Einstein bump.

bump.

If my question needs to be clarified, just ask.

>>4549192
Also, why wouldn't your frame-dragging Idea effect the decays of all the other particles as well?

What is so special about Kaons?

>>1515132

ENTJ is ass shit tier my friend.

INTP here.