/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11281474
Okay I started to read the whole thing just to be fair, but had to stop after the first third or so. The paper immediately makes a number of bad logical errors and then builds off of them, veering into oblivion. What I said in >>11282162 holds, the guy is absolutely taking dualism as a given from the beginning where he starts talking about qualia, and using it to prove itself. I'd break it down more, but really, yudkowsky explicitly refutes everything the paper is trying to argue better than I could. Read his series about p-zombies and free will.