/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8583372
I am a realist. There is ample evidence in all of these climate change threads here on /sci/ that the "science" is far from settled and apparently science is never settled except with man made climate change!?

In a court of law all you need to do is raise reasonable doubt, or prove by a preponderance of the evidence. The theory of man made climate change leaves much doubt, a preponderance of evidence impossible to produce because of the sheer number of variables involved, feedback loops, unknowns, the amount of data, the number of hands that touch that data, the quality of that data and of course one entire half of this so called science - projection - fortune telling - prophecy - whatever you want to call it.

The fact politicians and by extension "climate scientists" already have their grubby little mittens in my pocketbook riles me which is why I contribute here from the peanut gallery. Worse, what they plan on doing with this pilfered wealth from myself and other well meaning people here in the first world, the only people left on the planet with wealth to pilfer! All climate change policy is geared towards more concentration of power and wealth, nothing at all to do with environmental remediation.

I am saying that in a court of law, which many of these man made climate change proponents may find themselves some day, could result in charges of financial fraud with conviction because there is ample evidence accumulating of malfeasance in this man made climate change "industry" which reeks of nothing more than global fascism. Of course that is a pipe dream, this is larger than any court, they are writing the new global carbon (life) laws with this junk science and more likely it will be "deniers" who find themselves on that stand for failing to conform to dogma, climate heresy. Of course even I will bend to the new normal if it ever came to that. You should celebrate some outside the box thinking while it still exists for you are here anon, after all!