/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9108503
So when one instrument does not fit your hypothesis, it must be adjusted in order to make it fit? How typical of climate scientists.
Furthermore your video was pathetic; full of cheap strawman arguments.
>>9108702
Have another (You) you are so desperate for.
>>9108668
You completely missed the point. No doubt you did not even scan the article I linked.
>>9108679
>Oh, so then you should be able to show me using an argument the flawed climatology that invalidates AGW. And I should not be able to destroy that argument in a few seconds. So far you've utterly failed.
Climategate
>So instead of responding to the argument, you are just going to attack the source, while using the "Foodbabe" as your source. Ironic.
Your own argument was it is Snopes, so you lose.