/sci/ - Science & Math

>Literally proves the existence of God

>>12731860
>Where's the science? I just see a blog post.
I see. Well the problem is you simply don't understand /sci/ culture, for whatever reason. But don't panic, there are two options for newfags like yourself-- you can either accept that you have bad taste in 4chan, and leave, or you can LURK MOAR until you know better.

It is possible to accelerate the lurkmoar process using any /sci/ archive.

The secret third option is to kill yourself.

>>12719169
>That would mean it reflects most heat away.
LOL what the fuck are you even talking about? I have no clue how you're picturing that working. Did you read that somewhere or is it just that you don't know how to compute things? The CO2 warming calculation is very simple, you just need to know the rate of diffusion of infrared light in the atmosphere based on the CO2 concentration. It doesn’t require a computer, you can see that more CO2 leads to a warmer Earth without any assumptions or reliance on experts, and you can see it’s a significant effect, although you don’t know the feedbacks, so you can’t make a certain prediction without further data. But it’s a very simple effect to understand and predict.

>>12515727
>>12515734
>No, not at all, it is a philosophical attack, upon a philosophical school of thought.
Not science or math.
>Listen, I'm not saying that logical positivism is worthless, but it isn't the Lord's Gospel either, it's a school of thought, prone to as much error as other schools of thought. It has applicability, but it also isn't infallible, and it shouldn't be treated as it is.
This is just stupid. Nothing I've said is incorrect, you need to get on board or get out.
>Let's examine Quine's rejection of two of Carnap's central dogmas: analytic-synthetic distinction, and scientific reductionism.
>Quine's contention within regard to the analytic-synthetic, is that there is no thorough account of analyticity, as such it is not a distinction that can be made soundly. What're the implications of this?
Yeah let's not, you gibbering autist. You are certainly not addressing anything I said. Instead, you seem to be addressing and rehashing the stupid arguments of gay old men I've never read, straying into the political sector of /lit/eral nonsense. You need to go back to /lit/, or just far away from /sci/.

[math]{\color{red} A^{\displaystyle \color{orange} u}}_{\displaystyle \color{green} t} \color{teal} i^{\displaystyle \color{blue} s} \color{magenta} m [/math]

WHY ISN'T IT WORKING!!!!!!!!!!!

>>11565833
holy based guys don't do this shit

I don't want to discourage your enthusiasm but Jacob Barnett produced all of OP's results at the age of 12.

>>11461751
>/sci/ is for real topics, not mathfagery
>>>/x/

bump

>>10383220
based

me gunna die tonight niggas
I gon' end it all if I don't figure this shit out

[math]\text{ }^{\color{#511da7}{\displaystyle\text{w}}}\text{ }^{^{^{\color{#4136c0}{\displaystyle\text{h}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#3e56cd}{\displaystyle\text{a}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#4274cd}{\displaystyle\text{t}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#4b8dc1}{\displaystyle\text{'}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#57a0ad}{\displaystyle\text{s}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#66ae94}{\displaystyle\text{ }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#78b67c}{\displaystyle\text{u}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#8ebb66}{\displaystyle\text{p}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#a5bd55}{\displaystyle\text{ }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#bbbb48}{\displaystyle\text{b}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#cfb440}{\displaystyle\text{i}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#dea53b}{\displaystyle\text{t}}}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#e58e36}{\displaystyle\text{c}}}}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{^{^{^{\color{#e56e30}{\displaystyle\text{h}}}}}}}}\text{ }^{^{^{\color{#df4828}{\displaystyle\text{e}}}}}\text{ }^{\color{#da2121}{\displaystyle\text{s}}}[/math]

>>10315193
OP your shitty thread isn't working. A hurricane of /pol/tards has completely overtaken the board.

Am I fucked?
I'm feeling pretty good desu. The exam is supposed to be rigorous and proof-based. I just spent the past hour learning about vectors (those pointy things with integer values) and I'm reading about row operations now. From what I can tell, linear algebra is just y=mx+b applied to the substitution method, but in an archaic notation.
Right now, my plan is to build a firm intuition for linear equations and practice row operations for the next ~20 hours, then I'll spend the remaining ~3 hours learning about proofs and how to do them, but I think I learned most of that stuff in high school geometry.
Any advice to speed things up?

>>10184439
Forgetting someone?