/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11275487
>>11275501
>>11275477
>>11275512
Well okay whatever, you all have fun talking about "not a subject to be discussed". Meanwhile I will sit here and continue to wait for proof of space as something that does something in reality that isn't just another redescribed model with no actual proof.

>>11032986
>logic and reason support the theory of anthropogenic global warming
No because there is no empirical evidence nor scientific method to test such a false hypothesis. Using logic and reason would mean that you would actually have to observe

>scientifically illiterate denialtards will disagree

Testable explanation for your hypothesis, please. No, CO2 does not cause warming. Warming causes CO2. That's why when you burn things really hot they make this stuff called "smoke" which has CO2 in it, not the other way around. A hypothesis is only scientific if there is the possibility to disprove it. Otherwise it's just a religion and you should take your bike and suitcase to another town next Saturday morning.